The hand, and is described in detail in the book Judas of his sister Astrid Holleeder. He describes the book as part of the policy to the court to affect.
According to Holleeder, he is always there for his family and have his sisters meegeprofiteerd of the money that he and Cor van Hout have earned. “If I were the book would be read and would not have me go, then I would also be shocked,” said Holleeder. “The story is not true, and it is time that they the truth will tell.”
Holleeder spoke also of his displeasure over the silence of his sister in the court. “I don’t understand why they can not answer questions from the defense wants to answer, because they don’t want the truth above the table. But now she has everything written down, so well are our questions to answer.”
Holleeder was also in on the clips that have come to light. In these excerpts, he is yelling and threatening to hear it.
“If I’m mad, then cry and threatening I am”, says Holleeder. “Is that good? No, but my sisters scream when they are angry and express threatening language. As we grew up and we learned by the conditions in which we lived.”
Media coverage
The Public prosecution service (OM) showed Wednesday, know not happy with all the media attention that arose after the release of Judas.
It would start on Friday, 4 november, has been advised of the publication of the book, and complete, and unpleasantly surprised. “We regret the excessive media attention that has erupted after the release of the book,” said the officer of justice.
“No criminal case, so also not this one, that will benefit from the sharing of opinions by so-called experts,” says the officer. It is a reference to persons who have responded to the content of the book in the media.
Unbiased
The ORDER says the defense in an e-mail would have let you know that the media attention is no impartial trial can take place. “In so doing, the defence, the Public Prosecutor and the court shortage”, the officer of justice.
in Addition, it emphasizes the TO that Holleeder after his release in 2012 itself, the media came, so the image was of a ‘knuffelcrimineel’.
Lawyer of Holleeder, Sander Janssen, says that she is only the fear expressed that there is no unbiased lawsuit is possible.
Testament
It stresses that the book should not be seen as a statement in the process. Astrid Holleeder see the book as a testament, because she is convinced that she is killed by her brother because the police have been talking. The prosecutor concludes that the thought, her excuse can be taken.
The ORDER made Monday, is already known after the publication of the book is no objection to have more against the publication of statements from official reports from the case against Willem Holleeder.
Goudsnip
At the pre-trial hearing of 2 september, it was clear that Sonja Holleeder is not the full truth would have been told in the case against her brother. She has this, according to the lawyer of Willem Holleeder, Robert Malewicz, stated in a hearing of a witness.
The ORDER says Wednesday that Sonja this is referring to her statements about the case ‘Goudsnip’ and not about the case against her brother. Goudsnip revolves around the possible financial benefit of criminally obtained money by Sonja after the death of Cor van Hout. Sonja is the ex-partner of Of Wood. Sonja was not prosecuted after a transaction agreement with the TO. They paid a million euro.
Assassination attempt
Janssen was also in on the beschulding that Holleeder contract would have given to an assassination attempt from the high-security prison in Vught on his sisters, and Peter R. de vries.
According to Janssen research has shown that the witness ‘ statements against Holleeder would not be correct. Thus, the witness that he has a phone number and a keyword has received, which he had to pass it on to the phone.
“The phone number does not exist and seems to be composed of two phone numbers of acquaintances of the witness. Also, the police found no evidence of the deposit of 5,000 euro.” The motive of the prisoner for a deal with the would be a return to the prison of Curacao.
It has to be the extension of the remand of Holleeder asked. It is hoped that the substance of the case can start in march 2017. The defense also says to this date to strive.
Liquidations
It continues Holleeder (58) for his alleged involvement in a series of settlements, including the liquidations of joint-Heineken kidnapper Cor van Hout and property Willem Endstra. Earlier this year, was an indictment for plotting the murder of his sisters Astrid and Sonja and securities and exchange commission Peter R. de Vries.
The case against Holleeder is for a major part built on incriminating statements that the sisters together with his ex, Sandra den Hartog about him have passed.
By: NU.nl/Joris Peters
pic.twitter.com/HK9wSZZ3Br