On January 9 was the second episode of Who can see the Mole? . The episode is titled The last word, literally .
In this episode, the candidates get tips from former Mollen. An alert viewer records the last words of that advice (judgment molboek, key, lock and focus) and finds out that their final letters forming the word Klaas. The last word, literally : Klaas van Kruistum the Mole
Video:. Is Klaas de Mol
the program
Who is the Mole should participants perform tasks, solve puzzles and as much money as you play in the greenhouse. One of the participants ‘Mole’ and sabotaging the joint efforts. Candidates must bring constant map which according to them is the Mole and subjected to the end of each episode to a test. The one with the most mistakes flies out.
The viewer can go on the same quest, but is largely dependent on the assembly. In other words, getting the audience to see what would show the artists. With this knowledge, it is noteworthy to mention that Van Kruistum no longer have to maneuver from the position of prime suspect in the next seven episodes
. <- block |! quote start ->
” I had really hoped this year would be more difficult. “
Martine de Jong, De Volkskrant
Wrong leg
This can mean two things: From Kruistum is the mole either the viewers are very showy put on the wrong track. Both outcomes will not particularly like much of the loyal viewers.
“It’s nice if you can figure it out for themselves who is the mole, but it does not happen in episode two,” says Martine de Jong, who is the program for De Volkskrant follows and explains. “I had really hoped this year would be more difficult.”
It seems De Jong however unlikely that viewers are deliberately put on the wrong track. “That may be even dumber, you must not do that. Then you throw no smokescreen, but you just put a fireplace down. Then you just lying.”
Rob van Leeuwen, Who is the Mole -? follower for Het Parool , it would almost be a “big surprise” to find if it appears that Van Kruistem is not the mole. “In that case it is crazy that all the attention went to him.”
Jasper Piersma also recapper Het Parool , it is with his colleagues agree. “It would be weird if he’s not. But if Klaas it, but it was still a weak season. He was initially a little on the plain, but even after that designation with those letters it became increasingly clear that we were watching him. “
No foregone conclusion
Fleur Reijngoudt summarizes the episodes of the program to the AD together. According to her it was initially not a foregone conclusion that Van Kruistum would be the saboteur. “The mystery of the letters led me to another participant. And when I see the episodes, I do not feel that there are many indications in the direction of Klaas.”
Yet even they gradually become convinced “I am now working on my closing argument and explain all facts and figures at a glance I tend now known to Klaas, like everyone else, but I’m going to be subjected to a thorough analysis…”
“This is fun for a large group of viewers a bit muted.”
Peter Zantingh, NRC
Muted fun
“You always want to know as soon as possible who the Mole,” says Peter Zantingh NRC . “But this is fun for a large group of viewers have muted a bit. It was not the best season.”
Zantingh hoped it would be wrong proven in the following episodes, “but we were almost there the week more confident that John de mol is “.
yet will Zantingh that the makers have sufficient resources to make a potential mole of all candidates.
” If there are four candidates are, the creators aim suspicion on all four candidates for a quarter. I think they are constantly balance and when they see that the meter passage in one direction, they can slightly adjust using the assembly “
Smart viewer
but Zantingh also realizes that this kind of resources but work limited”. the viewer is no longer seduced by the assembly a few years ago, people thought yet.: “Hey, I hear exciting music, now I have to pay attention.” Now he thinks: “Yeah, they want me to find this suspect.” The viewer has become smarter. “
Wie is de Mol? is supported by a variety of online platforms. The program has its own interactive website and discussed in numerous forums and blogs. However, this same Internet is also an increasing threat to the program.
“It is the year more difficult to conceal the Mole”, Zantingh says.
“shared Ten years ago people hints not so massively on social media, you did not have TVs with ten million pixels where you can zoom in and out as many blogs where people keep track of when a candidate again start using his Twitter account, so you can see how long he or she was traveling with the program. “
” years ago you stayed with the outcome of the puzzle from episode two just sit. That could make for a difficult publicized, “says Martine de Jong. “Now you put it online and have everyone read it soon.”
“Due to the displacement of the Thursday program to the Saturday night it might become more of a family program.”
Jasper Piersma, Het Parool
Saturday
Jasper Piersma think that the programmers really do understand that the internet is home to an open and dynamic information but does not see in this the main cause for the alleged discovery of the Mol. He considers it possible that this season aware of what was easier to unlock.
“it may become more of a family program for the Saturday by the displacement of the Thursday program, where more children to be look. This season could be an introduction for people who are not so fanatical, but occasionally watch an episode. “
Although the majority of viewers after episode two already appears to whom the mol, the program continues to attract an average of 2.4 million viewers.
“many people believe these obvious hints do not and continue to search for the mole. That’s a compliment to the creators,” Zantingh continues.
“Even if there is literally spelled out who the mole is, many people remain firmly assert that it is not so and continue to seek. I find so cool to the program,” says de Jong.
Read more background stories in Nuwe forward
No comments:
Post a Comment