The Public Prosecutor (OM) had demanded fourteen years in prison against the cousins N. (31) and C (35). For the role of G. (41) in the murder was sixteen years demanded by the prosecution.
The trio would be exploring the area prior to the killing and observed, have been on the lookout and cars have made . According to the court, it is indeed possible that they were close.
For example, a fingerprint of one of the men was found on a parking ticket in a car that was left. But the end of that ticket was two hours before the murder.
There is around three “much that stinks,” said the court. But they found that their involvement could not be proved
Video: Suspects liquidation Endstra quite unlikely to pose
<- block: | video end ->
witness
The statements of the main witness in this case Hidir K, could not be used according to the court as evidence. His story contained according to the court inaccuracies, inconsistencies, ambiguities and contradictions.
The lawyer C., Nico Meijering, the reliability of Hidir K. always questioned. Meijering claimed that K. had his information from the media.
Ziya G. has not been present the whole process. He remained at large and believed to be in Turkey.
Endstra
Endstra was shot dead on May 17, 2004 in front of his office. The Russian Namik Abassov which the prosecution suspected of having actually Endstra shot, is not on trial. He died in March 2012 in his cell at a stroke.
‘Banker of the underworld’ Endstra was suspected of laundering when he was shot. He had, among others, contact Willem Holleeder. Who has served a prison sentence for blackmail Endstra and others
The prosecution has also Holleeder suspects there that he gave the order to murder Willem Endstra
No comments:
Post a Comment