Joost Zwagerman requires Propria Cures emails not showing – Parool.nl

23-02-15 15:22 pm – Source: Het Parool

Joost Zwagerman on Boekenbal in 2012. © anp

Writer Joost Zwagerman demands that students weekly Propria Cures withdraws a portion of an article about him, because the leaf containing quotes from e -mails from Zwagerman

.

Mr. Zwagerman and his family were then threatened with death, while actually knocked nothing of that story

Lawyer Cor Hellingman

Propria Cures published in the latest issue of the magazine an article about Zwagerman where e-mail from the writer were placed to the Editor

The lawyer Zwagerman threatened a lawsuit if the magazine the mails would allow online stand. Also in the printed copy of the magazine are the offending mails.

Zwagerman wrote the mails to Propria Cures in October 2013 after the magazine published an article in which the Zwagerman of subsidy fraud accused. That message had to be expanded later rectified by Propria Cures, but the e-mail exchange that Propria Cures now were printing the accusations are repeated. Zwagerman was seriously threatened after the article. Said earlier Propria Cures against the writer not to reveal the e-mail exchange, because it might come his safety issue.

On the Propria Cures website made the messages now black. Propria Cures gave his own words respond to the requirement of Zwagerman because the magazine does not have the financial resources to engage in a legal battle with the writer.

According to editor Daan Doesborgh the magazine published the mail Zwagerman to ‘readers to save a corridor to the Literary Museum in The Hague. ” Zwagerman donated recently his entire archive to the museum. Doesburgh “Then we can also mail us or publish, we thought.”

Death threats
According Zwagerman lawyer Cor Hellingman led to the publication of the article in 2013 to violent reactions. “Mr. Zwagerman and his family were then threatened with death, and there really was all wrong that story. No rule was correct. That article did they perhaps completely reversed. You can still assume that someone keeps his word, but now they still come back. ”

Doesborgh acknowledges that the article in which Zwagerman of subsidy fraud is then rectified. “But it’s blame someone presents itself as a lover of free speech is now demanding that we remove texts. ‘ Lawyer Hellingman: “Everyone should my client all write about him, to insulting texts to it. But one should not sell crap ‘

(By: Maarten van Dun).