Thursday, July 14, 2016

Review Summary: Mixed reactions to new Ghostbusters – NU.nl

The Telegraph – 2 stars

“The ‘reboot’ of the supernatural comedy phenomenon looks especially away as an homage to part 1. The logo is back, cultgriezels Slimer and Marshmallow Man are again stable met and there are guest rolls for the ghost hunters of yesteryear Bill Murray, Dan Aykroyd and Ernie Hudson (Harold Ramis died in 2014). As late director Paul Feig to provide the following Ghostbusters new impetus and fresh energy. a missed opportunity “

Het Parool – 4 star

“. Paul Feig, screenwriter partner Katie Dippold, embrace the actresses and adonis Chris Hemsworth (Marvel’s Thor ) the freak nature of Ghostbusters with an enthusiastic devotion, which is nothing too crazy, strange or risky. the improvisation drift at the pictures associated with a few misses and some loose ends in the plot, but the movie quite a pleasant wild and energetic character “

Read the full review

. <- block |! video starts ->

the Volkskrant – 2 stars

“the charm of the original Ivan Reitman was a senseless, popcorn-like narration showed populate by relatively serious ghost hunters, including those coolly mocking Bill Murray. However, Paul Feig is all about to caricature, including the characters of his comediennes (veterans of the series Saturday Night Live ). Sometimes those very much fun or witty. But a joke of a joke – it gets boring fast “

Read the full review

NRC – 3 stars

“. Something talking too much respect for the original from the remake and that is unfortunate. As if the creators did not dare to change much more than the gender of the characters. The remake plays too easy on recognition and nostalgia. Thus, the hit song by Ray Parker returns repeatedly back, the ghostbusters using much the same weapons as 32 years ago and has to indicate all the supernatural same quasi-scientific ‘techno peak’. “

Read the full review

By: NU.nl

LikeTweet

No comments:

Post a Comment